USA Daily News
Top US news in one place!

USA DN

Perspectives on Israel's Complex Challenges: A Conversation with Gen. David Petraeus and Historian Andrew Roberts

post-title

"Unprecedented Challenges: General David Petraeus and Historian Andrew Roberts Evaluate the Complexity of the Gaza War in the Context of Modern Warfare"

"Unprecedented Challenges in Gaza: General Petraeus and Historian Roberts Analyze the Complexity of Military Operations"

In this daunting context, clearing every building is only the beginning. Once cleared, substantial forces must be left behind to prevent the enemy from swarming and adding captured soldiers to the already over 200 hostages. This task is especially challenging in a densely populated area with a significant civilian presence, even with hundreds of thousands of people leaving Gaza City and northern Gaza. Reflecting on conflicts from 1945 until now, Petraeus and Roberts see no more formidable context for military commanders and soldiers.

The previous strategy of "mowing the grass" by making limited incursions and using air power to damage Hamas has been invalidated. Going further and clearing the grass down to the dirt is insufficient without a reasonable plan for what follows. Without a strategy to prevent the resurgence of Hamas and Islamic Jihad, the Israelis may find themselves in a recurring cycle of conflict.

The challenges in Gaza include hostages, human shields, suicide bombers, improvised explosive devices, booby traps, snipers, and fighters not in uniform. Hamas, with years of preparation, poses a multifaceted threat. The presence of civilians, in addition to hostages, adds another layer of complexity, making it hard to imagine a more formidable situation, especially if a rapid approach is pursued.

Drawing parallels to the fight against ISIS in Mosul, which took considerable time and resources, highlights the intricate nature of urban warfare against a well-prepared adversary. Gaza, with its unique challenges, may indeed pose a similarly protracted and complex military endeavor.

"Extended Timelines and Complexities: General Petraeus Details Nine-Month Operation in Mosul as Possible Analog for Gaza War"

Discussing the Mosul operation against ISIS, General Petraeus notes that it took over nine months, including planning and positioning forces, with substantial American support. The coordination involved advising, assisting, and enabling Iraqi forces, employing drones, precision munitions, and American intelligence surveillance. Despite these resources, the operation lasted nine months, and Mosul's population was not as dense as Gaza's, lacking the same number of high-rises.

Highlighting the challenges in Gaza, Petraeus acknowledges the potential incompatibility of Israel's goals — to destroy Hamas completely and rescue over 200 hostages. The complexity extends to post-conflict administration, requiring not only humanitarian efforts but also a counterinsurgency campaign to prevent the resurgence of Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad. A vision for Palestinian life post-Hamas is crucial.

Historian Andrew Roberts adds another layer of complexity, emphasizing the uncertainty of Iran's actions, potential moves by Hezbollah in southern Lebanon, and the volatile West Bank front. The sudden opening of multiple fronts could strain Israeli forces, especially considering the large number of called-up reservists, totaling 360,000. The situation remains highly unpredictable.

"Escalating Tensions: General Petraeus Discusses the Potential Regionalization of Conflict and the Impact of Imagery"

In a comprehensive discussion, General Petraeus acknowledges the immense challenges presented by the regional dynamics, highlighting the intricate network of Iranian influence in the surrounding countries. The possibility of a regionalization of the conflict is a serious concern, with Iran potentially pushing Hezbollah towards a confrontation with Israel. Despite Hezbollah's substantial rocket arsenal, Petraeus notes that Israel's air defense system could be overwhelmed, leading to devastating strikes and potential large-scale destruction.

Addressing the impact of imagery in the current conflict, Petraeus emphasizes the increased prominence of battlefield imagery due to the widespread use of social media, smartphones, and the internet. The immediacy of visual information dissemination, even if not always entirely accurate, significantly shapes public perception. The potential for mounting pressure on Hezbollah to launch large-scale attacks increases with the continuous release of pictures depicting destruction in Gaza, creating a complex and volatile situation in the region.

"Anticipating Challenges: General Petraeus and Historian Roberts Discuss the Impact of Friday Prayers and the Dynamics of Surprise Attacks"

General Petraeus underscores the potential challenges following Friday prayers in the region, a time historically prone to heightened tensions. Drawing from his experiences in Iraq, he highlights the influence of religious leaders in amplifying issues, leading to potentially problematic demonstrations. The post-Friday prayer periods in Muslim countries, including Israel, could pose increased challenges as emotions run high.

Shifting to a key theme from their book, Petraeus and Roberts delve into the dynamics of surprise attacks. While Robert Gates' maxim warns against acts that make no sense, the experts note that surprise attacks are surprisingly common, often employed by authoritarian or totalitarian powers. Democracies, needing political consensus, face challenges in swiftly launching wars. Roberts emphasizes that the response of a country attacked by surprise is often characterized by heightened outrage, citing historical examples like America after Pearl Harbor and 9/11.

In relating these insights to the current situation in Gaza, both Petraeus and Roberts acknowledge the potential for Israel's response to be influenced by the shock of the surprise attacks. They underscore the importance of caution in the aftermath, with President Biden offering a nuanced perspective by cautioning against the pitfalls of the quest for vengeance, drawing parallels to America's response after 9/11.

"Anticipating Challenges: General Petraeus and Historian Roberts Discuss the Impact of Friday Prayers and the Dynamics of Surprise Attacks"

General Petraeus underscores the potential challenges following Friday prayers in the region, a time historically prone to heightened tensions. Drawing from his experiences in Iraq, he highlights the influence of religious leaders in amplifying issues, leading to potentially problematic demonstrations. The post-Friday prayer periods in Muslim countries, including Israel, could pose increased challenges as emotions run high.

Shifting to a key theme from their book, Petraeus and Roberts delve into the dynamics of surprise attacks. While Robert Gates' maxim warns against acts that make no sense, the experts note that surprise attacks are surprisingly common, often employed by authoritarian or totalitarian powers. Democracies, needing political consensus, face challenges in swiftly launching wars. Roberts emphasizes that the response of a country attacked by surprise is often characterized by heightened outrage, citing historical examples like America after Pearl Harbor and 9/11.

In relating these insights to the current situation in Gaza, both Petraeus and Roberts acknowledge the potential for Israel's response to be influenced by the shock of the surprise attacks. They underscore the importance of caution in the aftermath, with President Biden offering a nuanced perspective by cautioning against the pitfalls of the quest for vengeance, drawing parallels to America's response after 9/11.

"Critical Considerations for the Day After: Petraeus and Roberts Address Complexities in Conflict Resolution"

In a nuanced discussion, historian Andrew Roberts and General David Petraeus delve into the intricate challenges of conflict resolution, particularly focusing on the aftermath and the imperative need for well-thought-out plans. Roberts notes the difficulty in promoting compromise solutions, especially in response to medieval and sadistic attacks, as seen in Hamas' actions in southern Israel.

Referencing historical parallels, Roberts draws comparisons to the 1973 Yom Kippur War, highlighting the potential for surprise attacks to lead to catastrophic outcomes for the attackers. Petraeus emphasizes the robust capacity of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) to withstand attacks and respond vigorously.

The conversation shifts to the complexities of securing Gaza, with Petraeus and Roberts addressing the withdrawal of Israel in 2005 and the subsequent challenges in governance. Petraeus underscores the need for substantial security personnel, potentially around 40,000, to secure Gaza, especially in the absence of Israeli involvement.

A key theme emerges as Petraeus and Roberts discuss the recurring issue of policymakers lacking concrete plans for the "day after" the fighting stops. Petraeus recounts a pivotal moment in the Iraq invasion in 2003, highlighting the importance of having a viable plan in place for the governance and administration of captured territories. Roberts cites the Malayan Emergency of 1952 to '60 as an exemplary case where the big idea was executed correctly, offering lessons in the importance of planning and diplomatic foresight in conflict resolution.

"Charting a Course for Gaza's Future: Petraeus and Roberts Discuss the Need for a Positive Vision"

In exploring potential solutions for the Gaza conflict, historian Andrew Roberts draws on the example of the Malayan Emergency, highlighting the importance of winning the "hearts and minds" of the local population. The positive vision offered during that conflict contributed to the defeat of the insurgency and the eventual granting of independence in 1957. Applying this to the current Gaza situation, both Roberts and General Petraeus stress the necessity of presenting a positive vision for the Palestinian people, one that assures a better life without the influence of Hamas, backed by international support.

However, the complexity of the situation is acknowledged. Petraeus notes the challenges of credibility faced by the Israeli government and the Palestinian Authority, making the task "fiendishly difficult." The importance of not just focusing on the destruction of Hamas but also laying out a vision for the future is emphasized.

In response to advising Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Petraeus underscores the need to combine military and political strategies. The challenge lies in articulating a vision amid the inevitable loss of innocent civilian lives and significant damage to infrastructure. Roberts highlights Israel's advantage in technological aspects, particularly in the realm of cyber, sensors, space, AI, robotics, and drones, as discussed in the last chapter of their book, "The Future of War."

"Morale and Resilience: Examining Israeli Advantages in the Face of Conflict"

In a discussion centered on the ongoing conflict, historians General David Petraeus and Andrew Roberts delve into crucial elements contributing to Israel's potential advantages. The conversation touches upon the use of advanced technologies such as robots, infrared, and acoustic tools to counter challenges like tunnel warfare. Moreover, they explore the intangible yet pivotal factor of morale, drawing parallels with historical contexts.

Roberts emphasizes the centrality of morale in warfare, citing Napoleon's perspective that it is "worth several divisions." The resilience of the Israeli people and government in the face of horrific actions, comparable to over 50,000 Americans losing their lives on 9/11, is noted. Petraeus sheds light on the significant impact on morale, detailing how reservists responded with dedication, driving down to report for duty. However, he also underscores the challenges posed by the composition of the force, primarily consisting of reservists who may need retraining, reequipping, and reintroduction to cutting-edge technology.

The dynamic discussion highlights the multifaceted nature of conflict, acknowledging the importance of both technological advantages and the psychological resilience of the military and the population.

Yes, Hamas is widely recognized as a terrorist organization.

No, the U.S. government does not officially designate Hamas as a terrorist organization.

The conclusion of the provided text emphasizes the importance of not only a military approach but also a comprehensive vision for the future in addressing the conflict in Gaza. General Petraeus underscores the need for Israel to not only destroy Hamas militarily but also to present a positive vision for the Palestinian people, acknowledging the challenges and complexities involved. Lord Andrew Roberts stresses the significance of morale in warfare and highlights historical examples where demoralization has had a profound impact. The discussion concludes by acknowledging the uncertainty surrounding the end of the Gaza war and the potential consequences if Hamas is not decisively addressed. The intelligence and military readiness failures are acknowledged, with a focus on understanding the creative tactics employed by Hamas and the need to reassess reliance on technology. The conversation extends to the broader geopolitical context, emphasizing the ongoing importance of the U.S. in the Middle East despite its pivot to Asia. Ultimately, the conclusion highlights the multifaceted nature of the conflict, encompassing military, political, economic, and social dimensions that require careful consideration for a sustainable resolution.

News