USA Daily News
Top US news in one place!


DeSantis's Defense: A Closer Look at His Antisemitism Fight Amidst a GOP Shift - Jewish State Lawmaker Flips Endorsement to Trump


In a robust defense of his commitment to Florida's Jewish community, Governor Ron DeSantis pushed back against accusations of inaction on antisemitism. The controversy unfolded when Republican lawmaker Rep. Randy Fine, the sole Jewish Republican in Florida's legislature, rescinded his endorsement for DeSantis in favor of former President Donald Trump. Fine alleged that DeSantis had remained largely silent and inactive during antisemitic demonstrations over the past 18 months.

In an op-ed for the Washington Times, Fine declared, "The past two weeks have made me realize our choice as Jews is simple. We can vote for the Governor who says all the right things or we can vote for the President who actually does them. When it comes to action, Donald Trump has never ever let us down."

Governor DeSantis, currently campaigning in New Hampshire, dismissed Fine's claims as "pure politics." He suggested that Fine's grievances might be linked to his aspirations to become the president of Florida Atlantic University, a position Fine did not secure. DeSantis denied any interference in the university's search process, emphasizing Fine's unsuccessful bid for the presidency.

Addressing accusations of not condemning specific instances of antisemitism, such as neo-Nazi marches and displays in Central Florida and Jacksonville, DeSantis asserted that he didn't want to "elevate" such actions. He argued against providing unnecessary attention to what he deemed as "nonsense" and suggested that these incidents were attempts to smear his reputation.

Pressed further on his stance, DeSantis pointed to his efforts in rescuing people from Israel and contended that selectively highlighting isolated incidents could play into a narrative designed to tarnish his image. In the face of criticism, Governor DeSantis remains steadfast in his position, characterizing the allegations as politically motivated and emphasizing his commitment to the welfare of Florida's Jewish community.

Governor Ron DeSantis, in a bold assertion, claimed that some participants in neo-Nazi marches may be fake actors seeking media attention. He aimed to distinguish these marches from recent pro-Palestinian protests, which he has vociferously condemned. DeSantis argued, "You have these people that are just marginal in society. I think some of them are fake. I think they’re trying to just get media clicks. So, that’s totally different than going out and having massive demonstrations of people celebrating the explicit murder of Jews, which is what’s happened in this country now. And so that’s something you just can’t ignore."

In a move that further stirred controversy, DeSantis, along with the State University System, directed two Florida universities, the University of Florida and the University of South Florida, to deactivate their chapters of Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP). Chancellor Ray Rodrigues alleged in a memo that the national SJP chapter supports terrorism. CNN has sought comment from the universities and the national SJP chapter.

This development comes on the same day as Rep. Randy Fine, the lone Jewish Republican in Florida's legislature, switched his endorsement from DeSantis to former President Donald Trump. Fine questioned DeSantis's response to antisemitism, prompting DeSantis to dismiss the move as "pure politics."

Fine, who was previously aligned with DeSantis on various legislative priorities, including the effort to strip Disney of its special taxing district, expressed disappointment in the governor's actions. In an op-ed, Fine stated, "Every piece of legislation you hear him talk about regarding Jewish issues is one I wrote. I love his words. His actions have broken my heart."

Responding to the criticism, DeSantis's spokesperson, Bryan Griffin, denounced it as "shameful political theater." Griffin highlighted DeSantis's unwavering support for Israel, citing efforts such as relocating the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem, combatting antisemitism in Florida, and securing funding for security at Jewish schools and synagogues. As this story unfolds, it reflects the complex interplay between politics, allegations of inaction on antisemitism, and divisive decisions regarding student organizations.

In the midst of swirling controversy and political discord, the saga surrounding Governor Ron DeSantis's response to accusations of inaction on antisemitism takes on a new layer of complexity. DeSantis, steadfast in his defense, contends that some participants in neo-Nazi marches may be opportunistic actors seeking attention rather than genuine supporters of abhorrent ideologies. This assertion comes as he draws a stark distinction between these marches and recent pro-Palestinian protests, which he has strongly condemned.

The situation further intensifies with the directive from DeSantis and the State University System to deactivate Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) chapters at two Florida universities. Chancellor Ray Rodrigues alleges that the national SJP chapter supports terrorism, prompting inquiries and concerns from the universities and the national SJP chapter.

Simultaneously, the political landscape witnesses the notable defection of Rep. Randy Fine, the sole Jewish Republican in Florida's legislature, from DeSantis to former President Donald Trump. Fine's shift in allegiance underscores concerns about the governor's handling of antisemitism, leading to a public exchange of criticisms and disappointments.

As the narrative unfolds, DeSantis's spokesperson staunchly defends the governor's pro-Israel stance, citing a series of actions that demonstrate unwavering support. However, Fine, once a collaborator with DeSantis on legislative priorities, expresses a deep sense of disillusionment, stating that the governor's actions have "broken [his] heart."

In this intricate web of politics, accusations, and shifting alliances, the story reflects the nuanced dynamics of addressing antisemitism, ideological clashes, and political maneuvering. The conclusion remains open-ended, leaving the narrative poised for further developments in this unfolding chapter of Florida's political landscape.